Dismissal of a Chapter 7 Case for Abuse. Under the former law,
only the US Trustee's office or the court can seek dismissal of a
Chapter 7 case for “substantial abuse,” and there was a presumption that
the case should not be dismissed
The new law expands this to
provide “any party in interest” may file such a motion for “abuse.”
A presumption is created that the case should be dismissed if the
debtor fails the “means test” and has income above the median income
in his or her state. The “means test” is a complicated test designed
to determine whether someone has enough income after expenses, some
of which cannot be over a certain amount, to pay off a significant
amount of debt over five years. Debtors who have enough excess
income will fail the test, and if they have filed under Chapter 7,
their filings would be presumed to be an “abuse.” This presumption,
however, will apply only if the debtor's current monthly income is
above the median income in his or her state. Even so, the bill
requires that all the information and calculations involved in the
test be submitted in every case filed under Chapter 7, regardless of
the debtor's income. The information and calculations will also have
to be submitted when filing for Chapter 13 if the debtor's income is
above the state median. Contact our office
to find the most recent State Median Income Amounts
Tax Returns are
Required. Under former law, there was no particular rule
regarding filing of tax returns as a condition of filing a
bankruptcy petition.
The new law changes this to
provide that a debtor who files under any chapter must submit to the
trustee his or her tax return, or a transcript of it, for the most
recent year in which they filed or should have filed one. They also
must submit to the trustee copies of tax returns that they file with
the IRS during the time that the bankruptcy case is pending. In
order to be able to confirm a plan in Chapter 13, debtors must have
filed tax returns with the IRS (if required to do so by
nonbankruptcy law) during the four taxable years before filing for
bankruptcy.
Credit
Counseling Is Required. In the past there, was no formal
requirement that a debtor participate in any credit counseling
before filing a bankruptcy petition.
The new law requires that
individual debtors within 180 days before filing under any chapter
must receive credit counseling consisting of “an individual or group
briefing (including a briefing conducted by telephone or on the
Internet) that outlined the opportunities for available credit
counseling and assisted that individual in performing a related
budget analysis.” Also, after filing for bankruptcy, in order to get
a discharge, a debtor must “complete an instructional course
concerning personal financial management” from an approved credit
counselor.
Stricter
Exemption Requirements. An item of property which is exempt
is protected from seizure or administration by a bankruptcy trustee.
Under the former law, a debtor was entitled to use the exemptions
which were applicable in the state in which he or she had been
domiciled within the 180 day period immediately before filing, or,
if the debtor had lived in more than one state during that period of
time, the state in which he or she resided in for the greatest
period of time.
Under the new law, for a
state's exemptions to apply, the debtor must have lived there for
two years immediately prior to filing for bankruptcy. If the debtor
did not live in any single state for those two years, the debtor
must use the exemptions of the state where he or she lived during
the six months (or the majority of that time) just before the
two-year period.
New Rules
for Luxury Items and Cash Advances. Under former law, there
was a presumption that a credit car or similar debt was not
dischargeable if within 60 days of the filing of the petition
charges were made for “luxury goods or services” for more than
$1,125 or cash advances were made for the same amount.
Under the new law, this is
tightened considerably. A debt would be presumed nondischargeable if
it was for luxury goods costing $250 or more and was incurred within
90 days before filing for bankruptcy, or if it was for cash advances
of $750 or more obtained within 70 days of filing.
IRAs
Protected. This may be the single provision that may offer
more protection to the debtor than under the former law applicable
in Texas. Under the law, IRAs would be exempt. This would apply even
if the debtor is otherwise using state law exemptions (which is the
case in Texas). The exemption would be capped at $1 million as to
amounts that are not “attributable to rollover contributions” from
various types of retirement plans listed in the bill.
Evictions
Aren't Stayed. Under the new law, an eviction can not be
stayed (stopped) in bankruptcy.
Stricter
Limits On Repeat Filings. Under current law, debtors cannot
file a Chapter 7 if they have received a discharge in a previous
Chapter 7 case which was filed within six years or a Chapter 13 case
in which less than 70% of unsecured debts were paid. There is no
restriction from using Chapter 13. After obtaining a discharge under
any chapter, debtors would be barred from using Chapter 7 for eight
years, and Chapter 13 for five years. The bill would also restrict
the granting of an automatic stay if the debtor has already had a
stay, and the case was dismissed, within the past year. A hearing
would be required, and the debtor would have to overcome a
presumption.
Divorce
Settlements are Nondischargeable in Chapter 7. Under the
new law, property settlements in divorce can no longer be discharged
in Chapter 7. In the past, they could be discharged if the debtor
meets a "balancing of the hardships" test in the Code.
Support Obligations Have Higher Priority. Under
former law, alimony and support debts were priority claims (paid
before other, lower ranked claims) but were ranked seventh in the
Code.
Under the new law, alimony and support claims have the highest
priority - ahead even of administrative expenses, including trustee's
fees. Many experts believe that in Chapter 7 cases, this will simply
cause trustees to abandon any assets unless there would be enough
proceeds from a sale to cover all the alimony and support debts and the
expenses of selling the assets. As a result, spouses and children will
probably receive less than they would under the old law. |